public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	greg@kroah.com, akpm@osdl.org, cw@f00f.org, harmon@ksu.edu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:51:00 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060714165100.6950813a.vsu@altlinux.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44B78AFA.80806@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5578 bytes --]

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:15:54 +0100 Daniel Drake wrote:

> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Same rationale, but the VIA SATA PCI ID had been submitted before, as 
> > well...
> 
> OK. So what's the realistic solution?
> 
> The best I can think of is something like this (see attachment).
> 
> It's not perfect, because if someone inserts a VIA PCI card into a 
> VIA-based motherboard, the quirk will also run on that VIA PCI card.

I still do not understand what will break in this case - won't the
external device just ignore the value which the quirk will write into
its PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register?

Can someone point me at examples of breakage caused by the original
quirk matching non-builtin devices?  The examples of breakage caused by
missing devices are everywhere now :(

> Is there a way we can realistically say "this is an on-board device" vs 
> "this is a PCI card"?

I thought about limiting to some range of PCI device numbers on the same
bus as the VIA southbridge, but this range does not seem to be
well-defined even for V-Link devices, and old PCI chips like 82C686 had
an external IDSEL# input and could end up on any device number (they had
only a single multifunction PCI device, however).

> This is untested but I'll happily test and work on it further if it 
> doesn't get shot down :)
> I have only added the southbridges for my own hardware and the one 
> listed on the Gentoo bug. I guess there will be more. I also wonder if 
> listing the southbridges is the most sensible approach or if other 
> devices (e.g. the host bridge at 00:00.0) would be more appropriate?

Using the host bridge as a trigger definitely does not look correct
(e.g., 82C686 looks like a normal PCI device and could be used in
systems with non-VIA host bridges).

> Daniel

> [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list
> 
> Gentoo users at http://bugs.gentoo.org/138036 reported a 2.6.16.17 regression:
> new kernels will not boot their system from their VIA SATA hardware.
> 
> The solution is just to add the SATA device to the fixup list.
> This should also fix the same problem reported by Scott J. Harmon on LKML.

Now this changelog is obviously wrong...

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
> 
> Index: linux/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ linux/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -648,10 +648,31 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_V
>   * Some of the on-chip devices are actually '586 devices' so they are
>   * listed here.
>   */
> +
> +static int via_irq_fixup_needed = -1;
> +
> +/*
> + * As some VIA hardware is available in PCI-card form, we need to restrict
> + * this quirk to VIA PCI hardware built onto VIA-based motherboards only.
> + * This table lists southbridges on motherboards where this quirk needs to
> + * be run.
> + */
> +static const struct pci_device_id via_irq_fixup_tbl[] = {
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233A) },
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237) },

This table is even more incomplete than the original.  I found these ISA
bridge IDs from VIA in my copy of pci.ids:

        0586  VT82C586/A/B PCI-to-ISA [Apollo VP]
        0596  VT82C596 ISA [Mobile South]
        0686  VT82C686 [Apollo Super South]
        3074  VT8233 PCI to ISA Bridge
        3109  VT8233C PCI to ISA Bridge
        3147  VT8233A ISA Bridge
        3177  VT8235 ISA Bridge
        3227  VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South]
        3287  VT8251 PCI to ISA Bridge
        3337  VT8237A PCI to ISA Bridge
        8231  VT8231 [PCI-to-ISA Bridge]

The major problem with this approach is that this PCI ID list will
inevitably get stale, and there will be no easy way to boot the kernel
on a newer system.  And there is no sign that VIA turns away from their
habit of using PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE for IRQ routing...

However, what about triggering the quirk on any ISA bridge from VIA:

	{
		.vendor 	= PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA,
		.device		= PCI_ANY_ID,
		.subvendor	= PCI_ANY_ID,
		.subdevice	= PCI_ANY_ID,
		.class		= PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA << 8,
		.class_mask	= 0xffff00,
	}

> +	{ 0, },
> +};
> +
>  static void quirk_via_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	u8 irq, new_irq;
>  
> +	if (via_irq_fixup_needed == -1)
> +		via_irq_fixup_needed = pci_dev_present(via_irq_fixup_tbl);
> +
> +	if (!via_irq_fixup_needed)
> +		return;
> +
>  	new_irq = dev->irq & 0xf;
>  	pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, &irq);
>  	if (new_irq != irq) {
> @@ -661,13 +682,7 @@ static void quirk_via_irq(struct pci_dev
>  		pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, new_irq);
>  	}
>  }
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_0, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_2, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_3, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_4, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_5, quirk_via_irq);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq);
>  
>  /*
>   * VIA VT82C598 has its device ID settable and many BIOSes
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-14 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-14  9:52 [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 11:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-14 11:40   ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 11:51     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-14 12:15       ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 12:51         ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
2006-07-14 13:20           ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 14:43       ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-14 15:42         ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:01           ` Scott J. Harmon
2006-07-14 16:17           ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:16             ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:24             ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:33               ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:51                 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:48               ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 17:06                 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 17:21                   ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-07-14 15:46         ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 16:13           ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-15  0:10             ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-16 14:09         ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-16 18:31           ` Greg KH
2006-07-17  0:34             ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-25  4:40               ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-26  0:42                 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-26 12:45                   ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-26 13:59                     ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-26 14:06                       ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-26 14:31                         ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-26 15:11                           ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-26 22:14                           ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 23:58   ` Chris Wedgwood
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-14 19:26 Brown, Len

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060714165100.6950813a.vsu@altlinux.ru \
    --to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=harmon@ksu.edu \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox