From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
greg@kroah.com, akpm@osdl.org, cw@f00f.org, harmon@ksu.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:51:00 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060714165100.6950813a.vsu@altlinux.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44B78AFA.80806@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5578 bytes --]
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:15:54 +0100 Daniel Drake wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Same rationale, but the VIA SATA PCI ID had been submitted before, as
> > well...
>
> OK. So what's the realistic solution?
>
> The best I can think of is something like this (see attachment).
>
> It's not perfect, because if someone inserts a VIA PCI card into a
> VIA-based motherboard, the quirk will also run on that VIA PCI card.
I still do not understand what will break in this case - won't the
external device just ignore the value which the quirk will write into
its PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register?
Can someone point me at examples of breakage caused by the original
quirk matching non-builtin devices? The examples of breakage caused by
missing devices are everywhere now :(
> Is there a way we can realistically say "this is an on-board device" vs
> "this is a PCI card"?
I thought about limiting to some range of PCI device numbers on the same
bus as the VIA southbridge, but this range does not seem to be
well-defined even for V-Link devices, and old PCI chips like 82C686 had
an external IDSEL# input and could end up on any device number (they had
only a single multifunction PCI device, however).
> This is untested but I'll happily test and work on it further if it
> doesn't get shot down :)
> I have only added the southbridges for my own hardware and the one
> listed on the Gentoo bug. I guess there will be more. I also wonder if
> listing the southbridges is the most sensible approach or if other
> devices (e.g. the host bridge at 00:00.0) would be more appropriate?
Using the host bridge as a trigger definitely does not look correct
(e.g., 82C686 looks like a normal PCI device and could be used in
systems with non-VIA host bridges).
> Daniel
> [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list
>
> Gentoo users at http://bugs.gentoo.org/138036 reported a 2.6.16.17 regression:
> new kernels will not boot their system from their VIA SATA hardware.
>
> The solution is just to add the SATA device to the fixup list.
> This should also fix the same problem reported by Scott J. Harmon on LKML.
Now this changelog is obviously wrong...
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
>
> Index: linux/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ linux/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -648,10 +648,31 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_V
> * Some of the on-chip devices are actually '586 devices' so they are
> * listed here.
> */
> +
> +static int via_irq_fixup_needed = -1;
> +
> +/*
> + * As some VIA hardware is available in PCI-card form, we need to restrict
> + * this quirk to VIA PCI hardware built onto VIA-based motherboards only.
> + * This table lists southbridges on motherboards where this quirk needs to
> + * be run.
> + */
> +static const struct pci_device_id via_irq_fixup_tbl[] = {
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233A) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237) },
This table is even more incomplete than the original. I found these ISA
bridge IDs from VIA in my copy of pci.ids:
0586 VT82C586/A/B PCI-to-ISA [Apollo VP]
0596 VT82C596 ISA [Mobile South]
0686 VT82C686 [Apollo Super South]
3074 VT8233 PCI to ISA Bridge
3109 VT8233C PCI to ISA Bridge
3147 VT8233A ISA Bridge
3177 VT8235 ISA Bridge
3227 VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South]
3287 VT8251 PCI to ISA Bridge
3337 VT8237A PCI to ISA Bridge
8231 VT8231 [PCI-to-ISA Bridge]
The major problem with this approach is that this PCI ID list will
inevitably get stale, and there will be no easy way to boot the kernel
on a newer system. And there is no sign that VIA turns away from their
habit of using PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE for IRQ routing...
However, what about triggering the quirk on any ISA bridge from VIA:
{
.vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA,
.device = PCI_ANY_ID,
.subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID,
.subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID,
.class = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA << 8,
.class_mask = 0xffff00,
}
> + { 0, },
> +};
> +
> static void quirk_via_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> u8 irq, new_irq;
>
> + if (via_irq_fixup_needed == -1)
> + via_irq_fixup_needed = pci_dev_present(via_irq_fixup_tbl);
> +
> + if (!via_irq_fixup_needed)
> + return;
> +
> new_irq = dev->irq & 0xf;
> pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, &irq);
> if (new_irq != irq) {
> @@ -661,13 +682,7 @@ static void quirk_via_irq(struct pci_dev
> pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, new_irq);
> }
> }
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_0, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_2, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_3, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_4, quirk_via_irq);
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686_5, quirk_via_irq);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq);
>
> /*
> * VIA VT82C598 has its device ID settable and many BIOSes
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-14 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-14 9:52 [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 11:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-14 11:40 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 11:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-14 12:15 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 12:51 ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
2006-07-14 13:20 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 14:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-14 15:42 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:01 ` Scott J. Harmon
2006-07-14 16:17 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:16 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:24 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:51 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:48 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 17:06 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 17:21 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-07-14 15:46 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 16:13 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-15 0:10 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-16 14:09 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-16 18:31 ` Greg KH
2006-07-17 0:34 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-25 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-26 0:42 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-26 12:45 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-26 13:59 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-26 14:06 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-26 14:31 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-26 15:11 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-26 22:14 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 23:58 ` Chris Wedgwood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-14 19:26 Brown, Len
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060714165100.6950813a.vsu@altlinux.ru \
--to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=harmon@ksu.edu \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox