Re: 2.6.18-rc1-mm2

David Miller
2006-07-15T05:39:54Z

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:06:45 +1000

> - __ret; \
> + unlikely(__ret); \

Wouldn't it be cleaner to wrap this unlikely around
the top-level "({ })"? When it sits on a line by
itself it looks strange, that much is true :)

Actually, the last time I saw a construct like this
it was a bug, someone was doing:

return unlikely(someval);

which turned someval into a boolean, even though what
was intended was that the full value was returned.