From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750806AbWGTRoI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:44:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750825AbWGTRoI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:44:08 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.232]:42975 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806AbWGTRoG (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:44:06 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ELhb8CEvy6RTDwlS7e6d7lLZ3jWoixuRwoalVaGYSf3OU9ZCyiIWdeaxsXWNBvEnDRSI7ISiSBovYX7GBk6glpxV5arrKupeUBcj4ENUvZrQXg2dhN/qyNX6073SrIij6qrmrmPUXVMav1Ti3Gug0CDlvGpWl9sZFmtrk/l+qRM= From: Benjamin Cherian To: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:43:59 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200607181004.55191.benjamin.cherian.kernel@gmail.com> <20060718183313.e8e5a5b2.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060718183313.e8e5a5b2.zaitcev@redhat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607201044.00739.benjamin.cherian.kernel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pete, Thanks for the reply. > > All right then. I'll send you a patch that backports the string caching > > mechanism from 2.6 in a few days. Would you be able to test it with the > > 210PU? > > Yes, that would be fine. We should get back to you in a couple weeks with this. > Although I am starting to think about creating a custom locking > scheme in devio.c after all. It seems like less work. What's your timeframe for this? Good luck with it. Thanks, Ben