public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:26:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060722162607.GA10550@osiris.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607220748160.13737@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:50:00AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> 
> > In kmem_cache_create(): always check if BYTES_PER_WORD is less than
> > ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN and disable debug options that would set the
> > alignment to BYTES_PER_WORD.
> 
> Why disable debug options?

Because if they are still enabled we would end up with an BYTES_PER_WORD
alignment (which is bad, see below).

> > This will make sure that all slab caches will have at least an
> > ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN alignment.
> 
> You can specify alignment at cache creation. Why do we need all slabs to 
> be aligned?

Uhm, that's the meaning of ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN, isn't it?

from mm/slab.c :

#ifndef ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
/*
 * Enforce a minimum alignment for all caches.
 * Intended for archs that get misalignment faults even for BYTES_PER_WORD
 * aligned buffers. Includes ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN.
 * If possible: Do not enable this flag for CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB, it disables
 * some debug features.
 */
#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN 0
#endif

> > In addition make sure that a caller mandated align which is greater
> > than BYTES_PER_WORD also disables the same debug options.
> > This makes sure that ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN also has an effect if
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is set.
> 
> Is there a particular problem you are trying to address?

Sorry, I should have mentioned it: on s390 (32 bit) we set
#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN 8.
This is needed since our common I/O layer allocates data structures that need
to have an eight byte alignment. Now, if I turn on DEBUG_SLAB, nothing works
anymore, simply because the slab cache code ignores ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN and
uses an BYTES_PER_WORD alignment instead, which it shouldn't:

also from mm/slab.c :

#ifndef ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
/*
 * Enforce a minimum alignment for the kmalloc caches.
 * Usually, the kmalloc caches are cache_line_size() aligned, except when
 * DEBUG and FORCED_DEBUG are enabled, then they are BYTES_PER_WORD aligned.
 * Some archs want to perform DMA into kmalloc caches and need a guaranteed
 * alignment larger than BYTES_PER_WORD. ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN allows that.
 * Note that this flag disables some debug features.
 */
#define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN 0
#endif

Since that didn't work I thought why not set ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN to 8, since
that would (according to the description) guarantee that _all_ caches would
have an 8 byte alignment. But that didn't work too.

So the result is this patch, which makes DEBUG_SLAB work on s390. And actually
guarantees what the above descriptions imply (unless the patch is broken).

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-22 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-22 11:06 [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments Heiko Carstens
2006-07-22 12:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-22 14:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-22 16:26   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2006-07-22 19:42     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-23  7:35       ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-23 13:03         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-23 16:24           ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-26  8:49             ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-26  9:55               ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26  8:50             ` [patch 1/2] slab: always consider caller mandated alignment Heiko Carstens
2006-07-26  8:51             ` [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch " Heiko Carstens
2006-07-26 10:05               ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 10:13                 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-26 10:37                   ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 10:52                     ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-26 11:16                       ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 11:26                         ` Heiko Carstens
2006-07-26 18:06                         ` Manfred Spraul
2006-07-26 18:19                           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 18:45                             ` Manfred Spraul
2006-07-26 18:59                               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 19:28                                 ` Manfred Spraul
2006-07-26 19:31                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 19:37                                     ` Manfred Spraul
2006-07-26 19:47                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-27  5:33                                         ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-27  5:47                                           ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-27  4:24                                     ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 11:22     ` [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments Pekka Enberg
2006-07-26 11:29       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 11:32         ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 11:41           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 11:48             ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 11:49               ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 11:55                 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 12:05                   ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-26 12:20                     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 12:31                       ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 15:24                         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 15:43                           ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-26 16:25                             ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 18:24                             ` Manfred Spraul
2006-07-26 18:28                               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-26 12:35                       ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-26 12:36                         ` Pekka J Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060722162607.GA10550@osiris.ibm.com \
    --to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox