From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750940AbWGXFcN (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:32:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751406AbWGXFcN (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:32:13 -0400 Received: from cpe-74-70-38-78.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.38.78]:20754 "EHLO mail.cyberdogtech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940AbWGXFcM (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:32:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:31:20 -0400 From: Matt LaPlante To: "David Rientjes" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18-rc2] Fix typos in /Documentation : 'F'-'G' Message-Id: <20060724013120.dc71ab61.kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> In-Reply-To: <9ec263480607232144g5e283156p86e5f84e8a92380c@mail.google.com> References: <20060723124920.76a5d725.kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> <9ec263480607232144g5e283156p86e5f84e8a92380c@mail.google.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Processed: mail.cyberdogtech.com, Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:31:32 -0400 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-Return-Path: kernel1@cyberdogtech.com X-Envelope-From: kernel1@cyberdogtech.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-MDAV-Processed: mail.cyberdogtech.com, Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:31:33 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:44:49 -0700 "David Rientjes" wrote: > On 7/23/06, Matt LaPlante wrote: > > --- a/Documentation/input/ff.txt 2006-07-22 15:09:50.000000000 -0400 > > +++ b/Documentation/input/ff.txt 2006-07-22 17:07:10.000000000 -0400 > > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ > > At the moment, only I-Force devices are supported, and not officially. That > > means I had to find out how the protocol works on my own. Of course, the > > information I managed to grasp is far from being complete, and I can not > > -guarranty that this driver will work for you. > > +guaranty that this driver will work for you. > > This document only describes the force feedback part of the driver for I-Force > > devices. Please read joystick.txt before reading further this document. > > > > guaranty? It does look weird, although apparently it is not incorrect: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/guaranty Generally speaking I've been trying to change as little as possible to achieve correctness...if we want to declare "guarantee" the official spelling for the kernel, theres no reason not to change this one too. :) -- Matt LaPlante CCNP, CCDP, A+, Linux+, CQS kernel1@cyberdogtech.com