From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932455AbWGYFEV (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:04:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932462AbWGYFEV (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:04:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:28591 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932461AbWGYFEU (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:04:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:34:09 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Bill Davidsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.25 Message-ID: <20060725043409.GA24837@kroah.com> References: <20060715025906.GA11167@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:07:53PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.16.25 kernel. > > > >I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between > >2.6.16.24 and 2.6.16.25, as it is small enough to do so. > > Why does the patch make it to linux-kernel-announce and the nice > announcement, like this one, not? The short patch description is far > more useful, since if it's to something I don't use I don't need to > apply or examine it. I have no idea how the linux-kernel-announce list works, sorry. Try asking the vger.kernel.org owners. thanks, greg k-h