public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
	len.brown@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.18-rc1-git] rtc-acpi, with wakeup support
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:25:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607250825.42928.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607241244.36574.david-b@pacbell.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]

Hi David.

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 05:44, David Brownell wrote:
> Hmm, so -- any comments?  This applies just fine to RC2 of course
> (it came out minutes before RC2 "shipped").  Seems to me this would
> be appropriate for the next MM release.

Didn't notice it before now. I'll forward your message to suspend2-devel (we 
have people there who might be interested), and try it myself.

> Also, given some mechanism to tell whether this alarm woke the system,
> this would seem to be the kind of infrastructure needed to make the
> "deepening suspend" work correctly.  That is, idle system enters the
> light weight "standby" powersave mode, then if it stays idle for long
> enough for the timer to wake it could enter suspend-to-RAM (or that
> new "suspend-to-both" mode).  There's certainly enough idle time on
> most laptops for such mechanisms to help save significant amounts of
> battery power, and it's best if such things don't explicitly depend
> on features like ACPI.

Yes. I'll look at it with a view to seeing if we can use it in Suspend2. I get 
requests for it from time to time, and it would be good to finally be able to 
do it.

Regards,

Nigel

-- 
Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham
5 Mitchell Street
Cobden 3266
Victoria, Australia

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-24 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-15 19:40 [patch 2.6.18-rc1-git] rtc-acpi, with wakeup support David Brownell
2006-07-15 19:48 ` rtcwakeup.c David Brownell
2006-07-24 19:44 ` [patch 2.6.18-rc1-git] rtc-acpi, with wakeup support David Brownell
2006-07-24 22:25   ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2006-09-29  6:54 ` [patch 2.6.18-git] " David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200607250825.42928.ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
    --to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox