From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932505AbWGYW3Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:29:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932506AbWGYW3Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:29:16 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34252 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932505AbWGYW3P (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:29:15 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Muli Ben-Yehuda Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 7] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:25:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: jdmason@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607260025.56903.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 25 July 2006 18:56, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > Hi Andi, > > This patchset contains a few Calgary bug fixes (mostly in the error > handling) and a few harmless associated cleanups (e.g., rearranging > structures for better alignment). It would be good to get these, > especially the bug fixes, into 2.6.18. How do these patches relate to the two earlier patches that Jon sent? 2.6.18 is closed for anything but bug fixes for serious bugs. -Andi