From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Multi-threaded device probing
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:16:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060726161647.GA9675@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060726112948.GA13490@parisc-linux.org>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:29:48AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:31:32AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > I don't know enough about SCSI to say if this driver core patch will
> > help them out or not. At first glance it does, but the device order
> > gets all messed up from what users are traditionally used to, so perhaps
> > the scsi core will just have to stick with their own changes.
>
> Right. Networking is in the same boat ... unless they're using udev
> or some other tool which renames network interfaces. I'm not entirely
> comfortable with the kernel forcing you to use some other tool in order
> to maintain stable device names on a static setup.
I agree.
However, almost all distros now use persistant names for network devices
due to the PCI Hotplug issue, so it isn't probably as bad as you might
think.
> Perhaps we need either a CONFIG option or a boot option to decide
> whether to do parallel pci probes.
Oh yeah, it will be probably both of them :)
> I still think we need a method of renaming block devices, but haven't
> looked into it in enough detail yet.
That could get "interesting"...
But now that we all are using /dev/disk/ and it has persistant device
names for block devices, I really don't think it's that big of a deal.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-26 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-25 20:30 [RFC PATCH] Multi-threaded device probing Greg KH
2006-07-25 21:09 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-07-25 21:27 ` Greg KH
2006-07-25 21:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-25 22:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-26 7:28 ` Greg KH
2006-07-25 22:15 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-07-26 0:08 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-26 7:27 ` Greg KH
2006-07-26 7:24 ` Greg KH
2006-07-25 22:57 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2006-07-26 7:22 ` Greg KH
2006-07-26 0:34 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-26 7:31 ` Greg KH
2006-07-26 11:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-07-26 16:16 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-07-26 16:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-07-26 16:46 ` Greg KH
2006-07-27 0:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-07-27 0:20 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060726161647.GA9675@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox