Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion

Hans Reiser
2006-07-28T08:48:16Z

andrea@cpushare.com wrote:

>
>
>As far as I'm concerned the thing I like less of reiser4 is the plugin
>thing, I'd be less concerned if that was a microkernel (fuse-like)
>userland plugin system.
>

Performance. If your plugin is performance valuing, it needs to be in
kernel. Also, FUSE does not have per-file plugins (correct me if I err
here). It would be nice to see it pay attention to reiser4 pluginids,
and thus become per-file.

Thanks for your other words, which I will not comment on because I agree
with them.;-)