Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]

Matthias Andree
2006-07-31T21:55:04Z

Adrian Ulrich wrote:

> See also: http://spam.workaround.ch/dull/postmark.txt
>
> A quick'n'dirty ZFS-vs-UFS-vs-Reiser3-vs-Reiser4-vs-Ext3 'benchmark'

Whatever Postmark does, this looks pretty besides the point.

Are these actual transactions with the "D"urability guarantee?
3000/s doesn't look too much like you're doing synchronous I/O (else
figures around 70/s perhaps 100/s would be more adequate), and cache
exercise is rather irrelevant for databases that manage real (=valuable)
data...

--
Matthias Andree