From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:23:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060727232319.65883c42.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44B26439.8070805@gmail.com>
Hi Tony & Krzysztof,
> > I think it would be different if trying to select something which
> > can't be selected automatically resulted in a warning. I think
> > I have to look at it then, but for now I'll use something like
> > "depends on (FB_CIRRUS=m && I2C && I2C_ALGOBIT) ||
> > (FB_CIRRUS=y && I2C=y && I2C_ALGOBIT=y)".
>
> Well if the i2c code happens to depend on another module, I hope
> that Jean would warn us in a timely manner :-). And even if Jean
> failed to do so, it would immediately result in a compile
> error/warning which should lead to an easy fix.
I2C and I2C_ALGOBIT are very unlikely to ever depend on anything, so
this isn't a problem.
> I still prefer 'select' just because it's easier to parse, but
> either way is okay, though your method takes me a few more seconds
> to understand.
The Right Way (TM) is to depend on I2C but select I2C_ALGOBIT. I have
plans to hide I2C_ALGOBIT from the configuration menu - the user should
never have to explicitely select it, it's only an helper module. So if
you depend on it, you'll be screwed.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-27 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200607050147.k651kxmT023763@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
[not found] ` <20060705165255.ab7f1b83.khali@linux-fr.org>
2006-07-09 20:37 ` [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-09 23:53 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 9:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 10:07 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 10:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 11:27 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 11:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 12:32 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 13:09 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 14:29 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 14:46 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-27 21:23 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2006-07-10 13:27 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 14:11 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 15:37 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 16:30 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 20:34 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-11 7:22 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-11 10:53 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-27 20:55 ` Jean Delvare
2006-07-28 10:05 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-07-10 15:18 ` Antonino A. Daplas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060727232319.65883c42.khali@linux-fr.org \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox