From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161201AbWG1Rhg (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:37:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161203AbWG1Rhf (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:37:35 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.200]:8004 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161201AbWG1Rhe (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:37:34 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=QtYFf9nbg8iIcVj+GiukYWu2A3QUz2zhGcRyBe9OxH+UY15i/LlG3b0+pVo6alGmscRrivLmYzTmKCt/cIvYsVaT9SM2WQhsLFxwyq2NqYW+CiOtYiK+apwCCD0V+wilG2zU03dR/zG6m2LOMkxThNrha00RuYTj1qAVlYFvN0o= From: Benjamin Cherian To: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:37:27 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mtosatti@redhat.com References: <200607271521.38217.benjamin.cherian.kernel@gmail.com> <20060727164951.ada33ed5.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060727164951.ada33ed5.zaitcev@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607281037.28328.benjamin.cherian.kernel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Pete, Thanks for the reply. > By the way, you didn't tell me if you tried to use alarm(2) across > submitted URBs. This is the technique ADSL modem drivers use. They > also have to have input and output streams running simultaneously. I'm making a library to operate my device, and I don't want to use alarm, because the user might need to use alarm in his own applications. Thanks again, Ben