From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161221AbWG1SlL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:41:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161227AbWG1SlL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:41:11 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:42147 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161221AbWG1SlK (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:41:10 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] Add comments to the PDA structure to annotate offsets Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:41:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org References: <1154102546.6416.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1154102590.6416.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1154102590.6416.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607282041.38506.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 28 July 2006 18:03, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Subject: [patch 1/5] Add comments to the PDA structure to annotate offsets > From: Arjan van de Ven So why exactly do you think these numbers need to be documented? If there is a reason there should be a comment in the code. Nobody should use fixed numbers, but always get the current ones from asm-offset -Andi > Change the comments in the pda structu