From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161227AbWG1SmY (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:42:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161229AbWG1SmY (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:42:24 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:3748 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161227AbWG1SmX (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:42:23 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] Add the Kconfig option for the stackprotector feature Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:42:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Daniel Walker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org References: <1154102546.6416.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1154103895.18669.5.camel@c-67-188-28-158.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1154104048.6416.25.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1154104048.6416.25.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607282042.47840.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 28 July 2006 18:27, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > I won't rule anything out, but for some it'll be impossible (such as > i386). It'll depend on the exact architecture I suppose.. for x86_64 a > gcc patch was needed Did the patch make 4.1.0? -Andi