From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751213AbWG2Syw (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:54:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751346AbWG2Syw (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:54:52 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:8920 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751213AbWG2Syv (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:54:51 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] Add the Kconfig option for the stackprotector feature Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:50:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org References: <1154102546.6416.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1154102627.6416.13.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060729174840.GE26963@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20060729174840.GE26963@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607292050.37877.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > After reading this thread, I do understand why you write once > "GCC version 4.1" and once "gcc version 4.2". > > But for the normal user this will be quite confusing. Yes it's a mess. > What about simply removing the first sentence of the help text since > it's anyway handled by the NOTE? It should be obsolete with autoprobing for the feature as earlier discussed. -Andi