public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Begin abstraction of sensitive instructions: asm files
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:56:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060730105657.GA5830@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060730105228.GA5810@elf.ucw.cz>

Hi!

> > Abstract sensitive instructions in assembler code, replacing them with
> > macros (which currently are #defined to the native versions).  We use
> > long names: assembler is case-insensitive, so if something goes wrong
> > and macros do not expand, it would assemble anyway.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> > @@ -76,8 +76,15 @@
> >  NT_MASK		= 0x00004000
> >  VM_MASK		= 0x00020000
> >  
> > +/* These are replaces for paravirtualization */
> > +#define DISABLE_INTERRUPTS		cli
> > +#define ENABLE_INTERRUPTS		sti
> > +#define ENABLE_INTERRUPTS_SYSEXIT	sti; sysexit
> > +#define INTERRUPT_RETURN		iret
> 
> Could we use some less verbose names, like possibly CLI, STI,
> STI_SYSEXIT, IRET ?

Apparently I can't read, it was explained in changelog. Could we still
use something shorter, like perhaps _CLI / _STI / _IRET ?
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-30 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-22  0:14 [PATCH 5/6] Begin abstraction of sensitive instructions: asm files Rusty Russell
2006-07-30 10:52 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-30 10:56   ` Pavel Machek [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-22  3:23 Chuck Ebbert
2006-07-22 13:34 ` Rusty Russell
2006-07-24 17:36   ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-24 20:54     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-07-25 23:52   ` Peter Chubb
2006-07-26  3:25     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060730105657.GA5830@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox