From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Jan Dittmer <jdi@l4x.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Jirka Lenost Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: ipw3945 status
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:47:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060730114722.GA26046@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44CC993B.6070309@l4x.org>
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 01:34:19PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Why not get rid of the daemon like bsd did [0]? Otherwise in
> 5 years you'll have 42 daemons running which communicate with
> the firmware of various devices, each having a different inter-
> face.
Because it would involve a moderate rewriting of the driver, and we'd
have to carry a delta against Intel's code forever.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-30 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-30 10:40 ipw3945 status Pavel Machek
2006-07-30 11:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-07-30 11:30 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-30 11:34 ` Jan Dittmer
2006-07-30 11:47 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2006-07-30 13:01 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 14:53 ` Theodore Tso
2006-07-30 15:00 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 15:09 ` Theodore Tso
2006-07-30 16:09 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 16:25 ` Jan Dittmer
2006-07-30 16:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-07-30 17:52 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-30 23:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-31 0:23 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-31 1:16 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-31 6:06 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-07-31 8:32 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 16:58 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-07-30 17:25 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 17:37 ` Rene Rebe
2006-07-30 18:03 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 20:09 ` Rene Rebe
2006-07-30 21:02 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 23:44 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-31 0:19 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-31 7:11 ` Rene Rebe
2006-07-30 15:57 ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-07-30 16:01 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060730114722.GA26046@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=jdi@l4x.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox