From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750840AbWG3Owi (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:52:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750923AbWG3Owi (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:52:38 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]:51732 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750840AbWG3Owh (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:52:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Cy6UAM2700chC3HeNWBgJXhKkkS5zmUXa/Hpz8YvTgL1jYvKsmm22AZEqhQQ4nQBUfg6PgfiXY8yR8hwSR9ZX+RBz1KnYckSeB9nV3c5v1pGkk3paPSeRMojCcW79UJHJbUDvQtMBfu6Y9rhPF0ct2xZS270O6E7QzGP9rthNUA= From: Jesper Juhl To: Redeeman Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc3 - ReiserFS - warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory or indirect item Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:53:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hans Reiser , ReiserFS List References: <9a8748490607300608v65ce3bdcsbb47273bb82a2d6c@mail.gmail.com> <1154266306.13635.28.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1154266306.13635.28.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607301653.43919.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 30 July 2006 15:31, Redeeman wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 15:08 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > I just got a warning message with 2.6.18-rc3 that I've never seen before : > > > > ReiserFS: sda4: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory or indirect item > > > > The message showed up twice in dmesg during two parallel "make -j3" > > builds of the 2.6.18-rc3 kernel source in two sepperate directories. > > I've tried to reproduce it but without luck. > > > > It would be nice if someone could tell me what the message means and > > wether or not I should be worried about it. > by default i would suggest worried mode. > > what does fsck.reiserfs say? > > nothing much : root@dragon:~# fsck.reiserfs /dev/sda4 reiserfsck 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com) ************************************************************* ** If you are using the latest reiserfsprogs and it fails ** ** please email bug reports to reiserfs-list@namesys.com, ** ** providing as much information as possible -- your ** ** hardware, kernel, patches, settings, all reiserfsck ** ** messages (including version), the reiserfsck logfile, ** ** check the syslog file for any related information. ** ** If you would like advice on using this program, support ** ** is available for $25 at www.namesys.com/support.html. ** ************************************************************* Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/sda4 Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes ########### reiserfsck --check started at Sun Jul 30 16:03:39 2006 ########### Replaying journal.. Reiserfs journal '/dev/sda4' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed Checking internal tree..finished Comparing bitmaps..finished Checking Semantic tree: finished No corruptions found There are on the filesystem: Leaves 139587 Internal nodes 937 Directories 33870 Other files 516740 Data block pointers 3875183 (1397 of them are zero) Safe links 0 ########### reiserfsck finished at Sun Jul 30 16:18:47 2006 ########### root@dragon:~# -- Jesper Juhl