From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 007 of 11] knfsd: add svc_get
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 21:05:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060730210507.12e33f56.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1060731004219.29255@suse.de>
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:42:19 +1000
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> /*
> + * We use sv_nrthreads as a reference count. svc_destroy() drops
> + * this refcount, so we need to bump it up around operations that
> + * change the number of threads. Horrible, but there it is.
> + * Should be called with the BKL held.
> + */
> +static inline void svc_get(struct svc_serv *serv)
> +{
> + serv->sv_nrthreads++;
> +}
It's a bit odd for a numa-scalability patch to be increasing our dependency
upon lock_kernel()...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-31 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-31 0:41 [PATCH 000 of 11] knfsd: Introduction - Make knfsd more NUMA-aware NeilBrown
2006-07-31 0:41 ` [PATCH 001 of 11] knfsd: move tempsock aging to a timer NeilBrown
2006-07-31 0:41 ` [PATCH 002 of 11] knfsd: convert sk_inuse to atomic_t NeilBrown
2006-07-31 0:41 ` [PATCH 003 of 11] knfsd: use new lock for svc_sock deferred list NeilBrown
2006-07-31 0:42 ` [PATCH 004 of 11] knfsd: convert sk_reserved to atomic_t NeilBrown
2006-07-31 0:42 ` [PATCH 005 of 11] knfsd: test and set SK_BUSY atomically NeilBrown
2006-07-31 0:42 ` [PATCH 006 of 11] knfsd: split svc_serv into pools NeilBrown
2006-07-31 0:42 ` [PATCH 007 of 11] knfsd: add svc_get NeilBrown
2006-07-31 4:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-07-31 4:16 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-31 0:42 ` [PATCH 008 of 11] knfsd: add svc_set_num_threads NeilBrown
2006-07-31 4:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-31 4:24 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2006-07-31 0:42 ` [PATCH 009 of 11] knfsd: use svc_set_num_threads to manage threads in knfsd NeilBrown
2006-07-31 0:42 ` [PATCH 010 of 11] knfsd: make rpc threads pools numa aware NeilBrown
2006-07-31 4:14 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-31 4:36 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-31 4:42 ` [NFS] " Greg Banks
2006-07-31 5:54 ` Greg Banks
2006-08-01 4:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-01 5:22 ` Greg Banks
2006-08-06 9:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-07 3:16 ` Greg Banks
2006-08-07 11:25 ` Greg Banks
2006-07-31 0:42 ` [PATCH 011 of 11] knfsd: allow admin to set nthreads per node NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060730210507.12e33f56.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox