From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030219AbWGaQVc (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:21:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030220AbWGaQVc (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:21:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:34440 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030219AbWGaQVb (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:21:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:20:46 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: bert hubert , Alexey Starikovskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, tony@atomide.com, akpm@osdl.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, len.brown@intel.com Subject: Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4 Message-ID: <20060731162046.GA4631@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , bert hubert , Alexey Starikovskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, tony@atomide.com, akpm@osdl.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, len.brown@intel.com References: <20060730120844.GA18293@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20060730160738.GB13377@irc.pl> <20060730165137.GA26511@outpost.ds9a.nl> <44CCF556.2060505@linux.intel.com> <20060730184443.GA30067@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20060730190133.GD18757@redhat.com> <20060731070800.GA22205@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060731070800.GA22205@outpost.ds9a.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:08:01AM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > > went ok. I wonder if something changed in acpi recently that caused this > > change in behaviour ? Len ? > > Dave, > > I'm no expert but I think it was you that made this change in > http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;h=567b39bea07e4fbbe091b265b010905e3d30ff5a;hp=1a7bdcef19261deff5a7ea8ee13d5a8ddb434a19;hb=911cb74bb9e77e40749abc2fca6fe74d87d940f3;f=arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > > + /* Do initialization in ACPI core */ > + acpi_processor_preregister_performance(acpi_perf_data); > + return 0; > +} > > :-) I'm puzzled. As that commit message doesn't match the diff. If you click "commitdiff", you'll see the actual commit for that msg, which is a one-liner. Your change in your previous mail makes sense to me though, so I'll commit it to cpufreq.git later today. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk