From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030281AbWGaReI (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:34:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030278AbWGaReH (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:34:07 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]:63195 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030281AbWGaReG (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:34:06 -0400 X-Authenticated: #428038 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:34:00 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: Dan Oglesby , Adrian Ulrich , Matthias Andree , vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, ipso@snappymail.ca, reiser@namesys.com, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Message-ID: <20060731173400.GA9466@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dan Oglesby , Adrian Ulrich , vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, ipso@snappymail.ca, reiser@namesys.com, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com References: <1153760245.5735.47.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca> <200607241806.k6OI6uWY006324@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <20060731125846.aafa9c7c.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <20060731144736.GA1389@merlin.emma.line.org> <20060731175958.1626513b.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <20060731162224.GJ31121@lug-owl.de> <1154364421.7964.22.camel@localhost> <20060731171620.GL31121@lug-owl.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060731171620.GL31121@lug-owl.de> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12 (2006-07-17) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan-Benedict Glaw schrieb am 2006-07-31: > Uh? Where did you face a problem there? > > With maildir, you shouldn't face any problems IMO. Even users with > zillions of mails should work properly with the dir_index stuff: > > tune2fs -O dir_index /dev/hdXX > > or alternatively (to start that for already existing directories): > > e2fsck -fD /dev/hdXX hat is not "alternatively", but "tune2fs first", then "e2fsck -fD" (which can't happen on a RW-mounted FS and you should only try this on your rootfs if you can reboot with magic sysrq or from a rescue system). -- Matthias Andree