From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey_y_starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk,
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, tony@atomide.com, akpm@osdl.org,
cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, len.brown@intel.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:57:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060731185713.GA16797@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060731162046.GA4631@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:20:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Your change in your previous mail makes sense to me though,
> so I'll commit it to cpufreq.git later today.
Do you think this will make 2.6.18? Otherwise any kernel with acpi_list
compiled in will have no frequency scaling, unless it supports scaling over
ACPI.
Thanks!
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-31 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-30 12:08 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4 bert hubert
2006-07-30 16:07 ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-07-30 16:51 ` 2.6.17 -> " bert hubert
2006-07-30 18:07 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-07-30 18:44 ` bert hubert
2006-07-30 19:01 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-30 19:19 ` bert hubert
2006-07-31 7:08 ` bert hubert
2006-07-31 16:20 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-31 18:57 ` bert hubert [this message]
2006-07-31 20:38 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-30 17:45 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-07-31 5:56 ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-07-31 14:04 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-07-31 15:22 ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-07-30 19:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-30 19:53 ` bert hubert
2006-07-31 7:50 ` David Rees
2006-07-31 8:12 ` bert hubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060731185713.GA16797@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alexey_y_starikovskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox