wire up missing syscalls on x86-64

wire up missing syscalls on x86-64

[Dave Jones]

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
index 5a92fed..07399fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
+++ b/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
@@ -687,8 +687,8 @@ #endif
 	.quad sys_readlinkat		/* 305 */
 	.quad sys_fchmodat
 	.quad sys_faccessat
-	.quad quiet_ni_syscall		/* pselect6 for now */
-	.quad quiet_ni_syscall		/* ppoll for now */
+	.quad compat_sys_pselect6
+	.quad compat_sys_ppoll
 	.quad sys_unshare		/* 310 */
 	.quad compat_sys_set_robust_list
 	.quad compat_sys_get_robust_list
diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h b/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
index feb77cb..0a08bbf 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
@@ -600,9 +600,9 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_fchmodat, sys_fchmodat)
 #define __NR_faccessat		269
 __SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat, sys_faccessat)
 #define __NR_pselect6		270
-__SYSCALL(__NR_pselect6, sys_ni_syscall)	/* for now */
+__SYSCALL(__NR_pselect6, sys_pselect6)
 #define __NR_ppoll		271
-__SYSCALL(__NR_ppoll,	sys_ni_syscall)		/* for now */
+__SYSCALL(__NR_ppoll,	sys_ppoll)
 #define __NR_unshare		272
 __SYSCALL(__NR_unshare,	sys_unshare)
 #define __NR_set_robust_list	273
-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

Re: wire up missing syscalls on x86-64

[Andi Kleen]

On Tuesday 01 August 2006 20:57, Dave Jones wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

No, the reason they're not wired up yet is that some infrastructure
for them is still missing. It's currently queued up for .19

-Andi

Re: wire up missing syscalls on x86-64

[Dave Jones]

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:55:34PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > On Tuesday 01 August 2006 20:57, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
 > 
 > No, the reason they're not wired up yet is that some infrastructure
 > for them is still missing. It's currently queued up for .19

Ah, I missed the fact that we're also carrying another diff
in the Fedora kernel for this.  Ok, as long as you're aware
of it, all is good.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk