public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Brunelle <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Accuracy of disk statistics IO counter
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:39:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060801193948.GC20108@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44CFABE0.8020501@hp.com>

On Tue, Aug 01 2006, Mark Seger wrote:
> 
> >>Specifically, I wrote a 1GB file with a blocksize of 1MB, which would 
> >>result in 1000 writes at the application level.  What I believe then 
> >>happens is that each write turns into 8 128KB requests to the driver, 
> >>which should result in 8000 actual writes.  Toss in metadata operations 
> >>and who knows what else and the actual number should be a little 
> >>higher.  What I've see after repeating the tests a number of times on 
> >>2.6.16-27 is numbers ranging from 6800-7000 writes which feels like a 
> >>big enough difference to at least point out.
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >Install http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/blktrace-git-20060723022503.tar.gz
> >and blktrace your disk for the duration of the test and compare the io
> >numbers. Requires 2.6.17 or later, though.
> > 
> >
> I had problems getting blktrace going and posted a note to 
> linux-btrace@vger.kernel.org at Alan Brunelle's suggestion and he also 

Documentation issues, sorry about that. It hasn't been updated for the
debugfs change.

> said he'd take a closer look at it himself.  On the other hand he 
> pointed me to 'stap' and I was able to use it to get the details I was 
> looking for - SystemTAP really rocks for this type of analysis!  As it 
> turns out my assumption about driver blocksize was wrong (sorry about 
> that).  It turns out that the size of requests from the driver to the 
> disk is 160mb and so the I/O count was smaller than I had anticipated.

160KiB, I'm assuming? :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-01 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-28 16:02 Accuracy of disk statistics IO counter Mark Seger
2006-07-29 10:42 ` Jens Axboe
2006-08-01 19:30   ` Mark Seger
2006-08-01 19:39     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-08-01 19:43       ` Mark Seger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060801193948.GC20108@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=Alan.Brunelle@hp.com \
    --cc=Mark.Seger@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox