* wire up missing syscalls on x86-64
@ 2006-08-01 18:57 Dave Jones
2006-08-01 19:55 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-08-01 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ak; +Cc: Linux Kernel
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
index 5a92fed..07399fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
+++ b/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
@@ -687,8 +687,8 @@ #endif
.quad sys_readlinkat /* 305 */
.quad sys_fchmodat
.quad sys_faccessat
- .quad quiet_ni_syscall /* pselect6 for now */
- .quad quiet_ni_syscall /* ppoll for now */
+ .quad compat_sys_pselect6
+ .quad compat_sys_ppoll
.quad sys_unshare /* 310 */
.quad compat_sys_set_robust_list
.quad compat_sys_get_robust_list
diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h b/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
index feb77cb..0a08bbf 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
@@ -600,9 +600,9 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_fchmodat, sys_fchmodat)
#define __NR_faccessat 269
__SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat, sys_faccessat)
#define __NR_pselect6 270
-__SYSCALL(__NR_pselect6, sys_ni_syscall) /* for now */
+__SYSCALL(__NR_pselect6, sys_pselect6)
#define __NR_ppoll 271
-__SYSCALL(__NR_ppoll, sys_ni_syscall) /* for now */
+__SYSCALL(__NR_ppoll, sys_ppoll)
#define __NR_unshare 272
__SYSCALL(__NR_unshare, sys_unshare)
#define __NR_set_robust_list 273
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: wire up missing syscalls on x86-64
2006-08-01 18:57 wire up missing syscalls on x86-64 Dave Jones
@ 2006-08-01 19:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-01 19:59 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-08-01 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 20:57, Dave Jones wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
No, the reason they're not wired up yet is that some infrastructure
for them is still missing. It's currently queued up for .19
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: wire up missing syscalls on x86-64
2006-08-01 19:55 ` Andi Kleen
@ 2006-08-01 19:59 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-08-01 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:55:34PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 August 2006 20:57, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
>
> No, the reason they're not wired up yet is that some infrastructure
> for them is still missing. It's currently queued up for .19
Ah, I missed the fact that we're also carrying another diff
in the Fedora kernel for this. Ok, as long as you're aware
of it, all is good.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-01 19:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-01 18:57 wire up missing syscalls on x86-64 Dave Jones
2006-08-01 19:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-01 19:59 ` Dave Jones
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox