From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932242AbWHBVrA (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:47:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932243AbWHBVrA (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:47:00 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:27958 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932242AbWHBVq7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:46:59 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.07,206,1151910000"; d="scan'208"; a="101077354:sNHT55691146" Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:36:11 -0700 From: "Siddha, Suresh B" To: Paul Jackson Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" , mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, vatsa@in.ibm.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption Message-ID: <20060802143611.A19038@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20060731070734.19126.40501.sendpatchset@v0> <20060731071242.GA31377@elte.hu> <20060731090440.A2311@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <20060731095429.d2b8801d.pj@sgi.com> <20060731101542.A2817@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <20060801235752.28519bda.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20060801235752.28519bda.pj@sgi.com>; from pj@sgi.com on Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:57:52PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:57:52PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: > Suresh wrote: > > Basically SLES10 has to backport all these patches: > > > > sched: fix group power for allnodes_domains > > sched_domai: Allocate sched_group structures dynamically > > sched: build_sched_domains() fix > > > A few questions on this, centered around the question of which dynamic > sched domain patches we should backport to SLES10. > > Readers not seriously interested in sched domains on 2.6.16.* kernels > will probably want to ignore this post. Paul, I will answer your questions on Suse bugzilla as that is a better forum than lkml. thanks, suresh