From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4 client - update d_cache when server reports ENOENT on an NFS remove
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:54:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060802195451.GA16552@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1154345965.6328.4.camel@dantu.rdu.redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:39:25AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Anuwat Phrukphicharn of HP discovered and patched this problem in
> RHEL-3, and asked that I push it upstream.
>
> When the 2.4 NFS client does a REMOVE and gets an ENOENT back from the
> server it does not remove the dentry from the d_cache. This can make it
> inappropriately keep writing to an inode that has been renamed.
>
> To reproduce, run this on an NFS server with /scratch exported:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> dir=/scratch/98201
> mkdir -p $dir/recv
> cat /dev/null > $dir/recv/x
> while true; do
> length=`wc -l $dir/recv/x | cut -d' ' -f1`
> if [ ${length} -gt 1 ]; then
> echo "problem occured!"
> date
> exit 1
> fi
> mv $dir/x $dir/recv/x
> sleep 1
> done
>
>
> ...and then do this on the client:
>
> mount server:/scratch /mnt/server
> while true; do
> rm -f /mnt/server/98201/x
> date >> /mnt/server/98201/x
> usleep 100
> done
>
> The file "x" should never contain more than 1 line, but occasionally,
> the server will report an ENOENT back to the client (indicating that the
> server script has renamed the file before the rm could occur). After
> this, the client will keep appending to the same inode, even though the
> file has been renamed.
>
> I've not seen this problem in 2.6 kernels, but I've not done any
> extensive testing there as of yet so I can't confirm whether it's still
> a problem there or not.
>
> A patch to fix this follows. It just makes ENOENT a special case when
> handling errors in the nfs_safe_remove function, and lets the client
> update the dcache as if the remove had succeeded. The ENOENT is still
> reported back to userspace. This corrected the problem on my test rig
> and for the reporter as well:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
>
> --- linux-2.4.21/fs/nfs/dir.c.unlink-enoent
> +++ linux-2.4.21/fs/nfs/dir.c
> @@ -1023,7 +1023,10 @@ static int nfs_safe_remove(struct dentry
> if (inode)
> NFS_CACHEINV(inode);
> error = NFS_PROTO(dir)->remove(dir, &dentry->d_name);
> - if (error < 0)
> +
> + /* if server returned ENOENT, assume that the dentry is already gone
> + * and update the cache accordingly */
> + if (error < 0 && (error != -ENOENT))
> goto out;
> if (inode)
> inode->i_nlink--;
>
>
Thanks very much for your patch Jeff, I'm queueing it for 2.4.34.
Cheers,
Willy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-02 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-31 11:39 [PATCH] 2.4 client - update d_cache when server reports ENOENT on an NFS remove Jeff Layton
2006-08-02 19:54 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060802195451.GA16552@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox