From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SRCU: report out-of-memory errors
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:57:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060802205730.GD1292@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0608021621210.8004-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:38:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Currently the init_srcu_struct() routine has no way to report
> out-of-memory errors. This patch (as761) makes it return -ENOMEM when the
> per-cpu data allocation fails.
>
> The patch also makes srcu_init_notifier_head() report a BUG if a notifier
> head can't be initialized. Perhaps it should return -ENOMEM instead, but
> in the most likely cases where this might occur I don't think any recovery
> is possible. Notifier chains generally are not created dynamically.
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
>
> ---
>
> Paul, I trust you will agree with the changes this makes to the SRCU code.
Indeed I do... Good catch!!!
Thanx, Paul
> The second part of this patch series will convert the cpufreq transition
> notifier chain to use SRCU, with the initialization occuring in a
> core_initcall routine. Although I haven't actually tried it, it seems
> very likely that an attempt to use the notifier chain before it has been
> initialized will cause a memory-address fault.
>
> Alan Stern
>
>
> Index: 2.6.18-rc2-mm1/kernel/sys.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.18-rc2-mm1.orig/kernel/sys.c
> +++ 2.6.18-rc2-mm1/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_notifier_call_cha
> void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh)
> {
> mutex_init(&nh->mutex);
> - init_srcu_struct(&nh->srcu);
> + BUG_ON(init_srcu_struct(&nh->srcu) < 0);
> nh->head = NULL;
> }
>
> Index: 2.6.18-rc2-mm1/kernel/srcu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.18-rc2-mm1.orig/kernel/srcu.c
> +++ 2.6.18-rc2-mm1/kernel/srcu.c
> @@ -42,11 +42,12 @@
> * to any other function. Each srcu_struct represents a separate domain
> * of SRCU protection.
> */
> -void init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp)
> +int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp)
> {
> sp->completed = 0;
> - sp->per_cpu_ref = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_struct_array);
> mutex_init(&sp->mutex);
> + sp->per_cpu_ref = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_struct_array);
> + return (sp->per_cpu_ref ? 0 : -ENOMEM);
> }
>
> /*
> Index: 2.6.18-rc2-mm1/include/linux/srcu.h
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.18-rc2-mm1.orig/include/linux/srcu.h
> +++ 2.6.18-rc2-mm1/include/linux/srcu.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct srcu_struct {
> #define srcu_barrier()
> #endif /* #else #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT */
>
> -void init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
> +int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
> void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
> int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *sp);
> void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-02 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-30 6:27 Linux v2.6.18-rc3 Linus Torvalds
2006-07-30 8:30 ` Russell King
2006-07-31 8:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-31 4:13 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-07-31 4:27 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-31 14:54 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-31 15:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-31 15:59 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-31 20:34 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-02 4:31 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-08-02 4:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-02 19:57 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-08-02 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-02 20:23 ` Russell King
2006-08-02 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-02 20:32 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-02 20:58 ` Russell King
2006-08-02 21:01 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-02 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-08-02 21:38 ` Russell King
2006-08-02 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-08-02 22:05 ` Russell King
2006-08-02 20:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] SRCU: report out-of-memory errors Alan Stern
2006-08-02 20:57 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2006-08-02 20:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: make the transition_notifier chain use SRCU Alan Stern
2006-08-03 15:58 ` Linux v2.6.18-rc3 Avuton Olrich
2006-08-03 16:40 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060802205730.GD1292@us.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox