From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 02:32:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060803063230.GY32572@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0943d9e0607240628n115deac4x3befe5d39037248f@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 02:28:03PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 24/07/06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >update: there's also a neat gcc extension trick suggested by Arjan:
> >__builtin_classify_type(). This converts types into integers!
>
> It's not really reliable as it doesn't distinguish well between types.
> All the structures, no matter what they contain, have the same id
> (which I think only refers to the fact that it is built-in type,
> pointer or structure, without differentiation).
__builtin_classify_type () doesn't give types unique ID, it only classifies
them:
/* Values returned by __builtin_classify_type. */
enum type_class
{
no_type_class = -1,
void_type_class, integer_type_class, char_type_class,
enumeral_type_class, boolean_type_class,
pointer_type_class, reference_type_class, offset_type_class,
real_type_class, complex_type_class,
function_type_class, method_type_class,
record_type_class, union_type_class,
array_type_class, string_type_class,
lang_type_class
};
All structures are given record_type_class, all unions union_type_class,
all pointers pointer_type_class, etc.
That doesn't mean you can't use it in the kernel as additional source
of type checking (in addition to e.g. sizeof and __alignof__).
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-03 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-11 11:18 [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 0/9] Kernel memory leak detector 0.7 Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 1/9] Base support for kmemleak Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13 11:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-13 12:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 2/9] Some documentation " Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 3/9] Add the memory allocation/freeing hooks " Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 4/9] Modules support " Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 5/9] Add kmemleak support for i386 Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 6/9] Add kmemleak support for ARM Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 5:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-12 8:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 8:17 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-12 8:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 11:08 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-12 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 11:56 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-12 12:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 13:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 14:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 22:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 12:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 19:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 22:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13 5:53 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-13 6:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13 7:57 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-13 9:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13 10:04 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-13 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-13 8:11 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-13 10:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-14 4:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-14 5:46 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-14 5:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-14 12:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-14 13:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-14 13:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-14 13:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-12 9:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-24 10:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-24 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-24 10:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-24 11:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-24 13:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-08-03 6:32 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2006-08-03 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:22 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 8/9] Simple testing for kmemleak Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:22 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 9/9] Keep the __init functions after initialization Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060803063230.GY32572@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox