From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964784AbWHCREw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:04:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932580AbWHCREw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:04:52 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:18619 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932579AbWHCREv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:04:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:00:20 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Marcel Holtmann , Neil Brown Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] Next 2.6.17-stable review cycle will be starting in about 24 hours Message-ID: <20060803170020.GA10784@kroah.com> References: <20060803074850.GA28301@kroah.com> <1154623652.3905.76.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1154623652.3905.76.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 06:47:32PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > This is a heads up that the next 2.6.17-stable review cycle will be > > starting in about 24 hours. I've caught up on all pending -stable > > patches that I know about and placed them in our queue, which can be > > browsed online at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=tree;f=queue-2.6.17 > > > > If anyone sees that this queue is missing something that they feel > > should get into the next 2.6.17-stable release, please let us know at > > stable@kernel.org within the next 24 hours or so. > > instead of ext3-avoid-triggering-ext3_error-on-bad-nfs-file-handle.patch > it makes more sense to include the revised patches from Neil: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/430323 > > It seems that these are not merged upstream, but my understanding was > that they were the best way to fix this. For RHEL4 we are going with > these two patches. Hm, I just went with what Neil sent me for inclusion. Neil, do you want me to change the patches you sent us? thanks, greg k-h