From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750734AbWHFV7z (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Aug 2006 17:59:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750731AbWHFV7y (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Aug 2006 17:59:54 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:39437 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750727AbWHFV7y (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Aug 2006 17:59:54 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 21:05:52 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox Cc: Pekka J Enberg , Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, tigran@veritas.com Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2 Message-ID: <20060805210552.GD5417@ucw.cz> References: <1154021616.13509.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1154021616.13509.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Sure. Though I wonder if sys_frevoke is enough for us and we can drop > > sys_revoke completely. > > Alas not. Some Unix devices have side effects when you open() them. We probably want some other solution for those, anyway...? Like open(..., O_NONE)? Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.