From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751027AbWHIRBz (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:01:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751160AbWHIRBy (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:01:54 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.225]:30735 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751027AbWHIRBy (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:01:54 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=YubFDa6Td8UBujWhZ8b+n8w9Z8lxDRLm+quVF0PH5WuKTBtldsOWURUjtk4oDt+a1jAWNvyekbNykCpCIR8m1gdQeUPvWnne8wnkBc6CzF3VebOojnV70LmFAYnbHaFSavhuU5mx/m81WHdq2nO/LmdChQXj2hoqDBykvtGwZC8= From: Benjamin Cherian To: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:01:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mtosatti@redhat.com, marcelo@kvack.org References: <200608040957.05034.benjamin.cherian.kernel@gmail.com> <20060804165550.GA26701@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20060804165550.GA26701@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608091001.43570.benjamin.cherian.kernel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Willy, Sorry I didn't notice your email till now. On Friday 04 August 2006 09:55, Willy Tarreau wrote: > The problem is that Marcelo is very very busy those days (as you might have > noticed from the delay between each release), and there are a good bunch of > security fixes in -rc3 which should wait too much in -rc. Maybe an -rc4 > would be OK, but I don't know if Marcelo has enough time to spend on yet > another RC. Otherwise, if I produce a 2.4.34-pre1 about one week after > 2.4.33, does that fit your needs ? I already have a few fixes waiting which > might be worth a first pre-release. It would be nice if you could do another rc, because otherwise it seems the patch wouldn't get into a stable kernel for a long time. But if it's really too much work for Marcelo, I would understand you putting it in th 2.4.34 pre-release. Thanks again, Ben