From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: npiggin@suse.de, manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Simple Slab: A slab allocator with minimal meta information
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:07:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060810020708.GN6908@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608091744290.4966@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:52:00PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> This is by no means complete and probably full of bugs. Feedback and help
> wanted! I have tried to switch over two minor system caches (memory
> policies) to use simple slab and it seems to work. We probably have some
> way to go before we could do performance tests.
There's probably enough here to shim in a regular slab and kmalloc
interface layer to run a desktop machine.
> The Simple Slab is not NUMA capable at this point and I think the
> NUMAness may better be implemented in a different way. Maybe we
> could understand the Simple Slab as a lower layer and then add all
> the bells and whistles including NUMAness, proc API, kmalloc caches
> etc. on top as a management layer for this lower level
> functionality.
I think a layered approach to handling NUMA and the like makes an
awful lot of sense here. And probably greatly simplifies locking, etc.
Also, I like that you've gone to off-slab accounting. Not only does
this simplify things overall, it's good for memory footprint and
possibly better on cache footprint.
It's gonna need a better name though..
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-10 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-10 0:52 [RFC] Simple Slab: A slab allocator with minimal meta information Christoph Lameter
2006-08-10 2:07 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2006-08-10 5:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-10 5:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-08-10 5:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-10 5:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-08-10 5:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-10 6:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-08-10 15:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-08-10 18:47 ` Manfred Spraul
2006-08-10 18:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-08-11 17:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-08-11 20:33 ` Manfred Spraul
2006-08-11 21:02 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-14 1:10 linux
2006-08-14 11:47 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060810020708.GN6908@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox