From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:24:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060812162447.GE5084@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44DB1F19.8000504@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 01:57:13PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ...
> > I'm currently
> > going through all 2.6.17.7 and 2.6.17.8 patches looking for patches I
> > should apply.
>
> Suggested updates for drivers/ieee1394/:
>
> (from 2.6.17.2)
> Fix broken suspend/resume in ohci1394
> should be applicable as-is. This does not add full suspend/resume
> functionality to ohci1394 but it fixes fatal side effects on other
> on-board hardware after resume.
>
> (from 2.6.17.8)
> ieee1394: sbp2: enable auto spin-up for Maxtor disks
> doesn't apply to 2.6.16 as-is.
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183011#c6 has an adapted
> version. I will mail it to you with proper description and signed-off-by
> later today. While I am at it, I will resend that ohci1394 patch too.
Thanks, I've applied them both.
> I have a related question about your plans with Linux 2.6.16.yy.
> Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt says:
>
> - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
> marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real
> security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue. In short,
> something critical.
>
> I plan to submit a patch of the kind "fix recognition of a quirky
> device" for 2.6.18. That patch does not fix an oops, hang, data
> corruption, or security hole. (The patch will fulfill all other criteria
> from stable_kernel_rules.) Do you consider "can't use that shiny device
> under Linux" as "oh, that's not good" in the context of Linux 2.6.16.yy?
>...
If the device doesn't work, it's an "oh, that's not good" issue. ;-)
More seriously:
I consider stable_kernel_rules.txt as a more formal description of
"avoid regressions".
If the patch is tested, unlikely to break anything and included in
Linus' tree it's a candidate for 2.6.16.
> Stefan Richter
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-12 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-09 21:45 Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-09 22:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-09 22:18 ` Greg KH
2006-08-09 22:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-09 22:53 ` Greg KH
2006-08-09 23:05 ` Chris Wright
2006-08-09 23:20 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-08-10 11:57 ` Stefan Richter
2006-08-10 16:43 ` [PATCH 2.6.16.27] Fix broken suspend/resume in ohci1394 Stefan Richter
2006-08-10 16:45 ` [PATCH 2.6.16.27] ieee1394: sbp2: enable auto spin-up for Maxtor disks Stefan Richter
2006-08-12 16:24 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-03 20:49 Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch Greg KH
2006-08-04 2:43 ` Josh Boyer
2006-08-04 6:26 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-04 23:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-06 0:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-06 4:52 ` Greg KH
2006-08-20 22:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-20 23:05 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 23:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-21 6:21 ` David Miller
2006-08-21 9:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-22 7:27 ` Matthias Andree
2006-08-24 13:00 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20060820185123.e84fafaf.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-08-20 22:51 ` Sean
2006-08-20 23:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-20 23:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-21 0:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-21 13:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-06 6:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-07 12:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-07 17:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-07 23:30 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-08 19:55 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060812162447.GE5084@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox