From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750734AbWHMHQi (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 03:16:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750736AbWHMHQi (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 03:16:38 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:20656 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750734AbWHMHQi (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 03:16:38 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH for review] [109/145] x86_64: Convert modlist_lock to be a raw spinlock Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:15:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar References: <20060810 935.775038000@suse.de> <200608130852.46300.ak@suse.de> <20060813000231.1ef1e21e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060813000231.1ef1e21e.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608130915.45114.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > What is the official portable interface to do a raw spinlock > > if this one doesn't work? > > I don't see a way, really. Apart from going in and implementing it on the > various architectures. Hmpf. Maybe lockdep just needs a recursion check. -Andi