From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965284AbWHOH5T (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:57:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965286AbWHOH5T (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:57:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44977 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965284AbWHOH5S (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:57:18 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: [patch] i386: annotate FIX_STACK() and the rest of nmi() Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:57:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel , Jan Beulich References: <200608141658_MC3-1-C818-892D@compuserve.com> In-Reply-To: <200608141658_MC3-1-C818-892D@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608150957.07369.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 14 August 2006 22:56, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > In i386's entry.S, FIX_STACK() needs annotation because it > replaces the stack pointer. And the rest of nmi() needs > annotation in order to compile with these new annotations. Added thanks. -Andi