public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] do_sched_setscheduler: don't take tasklist_lock
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:31:13 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060819193113.GA7969@oleg> (raw)

Use rcu locks instead. sched_setscheduler() now takes ->siglock
before reading ->signal->rlim[].

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- 2.6.18-rc4/kernel/sched.c~2_signal	2006-08-19 20:22:09.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.18-rc4/kernel/sched.c	2006-08-19 21:14:19.000000000 +0400
@@ -4043,6 +4043,8 @@ static void __setscheduler(struct task_s
  * @p: the task in question.
  * @policy: new policy.
  * @param: structure containing the new RT priority.
+ *
+ * NOTE: the task may be already dead
  */
 int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
 		       struct sched_param *param)
@@ -4078,19 +4080,26 @@ recheck:
 	 * Allow unprivileged RT tasks to decrease priority:
 	 */
 	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
+		unsigned long rlim_rtprio;
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		if (!lock_task_sighand(p, &flags))
+			return -ESRCH;
+		rlim_rtprio = p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_RTPRIO].rlim_cur;
+		unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
+
 		/*
 		 * can't change policy, except between SCHED_NORMAL
 		 * and SCHED_BATCH:
 		 */
 		if (((policy != SCHED_NORMAL && p->policy != SCHED_BATCH) &&
 			(policy != SCHED_BATCH && p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL)) &&
-				!p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_RTPRIO].rlim_cur)
+				!rlim_rtprio)
 			return -EPERM;
 		/* can't increase priority */
 		if ((policy != SCHED_NORMAL && policy != SCHED_BATCH) &&
 		    param->sched_priority > p->rt_priority &&
-		    param->sched_priority >
-				p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_RTPRIO].rlim_cur)
+		    param->sched_priority > rlim_rtprio)
 			return -EPERM;
 		/* can't change other user's priorities */
 		if ((current->euid != p->euid) &&
@@ -4156,14 +4165,13 @@ do_sched_setscheduler(pid_t pid, int pol
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (copy_from_user(&lparam, param, sizeof(struct sched_param)))
 		return -EFAULT;
-	read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	retval = -ESRCH;
 	p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
-	if (!p) {
-		read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
-		return -ESRCH;
-	}
-	retval = sched_setscheduler(p, policy, &lparam);
-	read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	if (p != NULL)
+		retval = sched_setscheduler(p, policy, &lparam);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return retval;
 }


                 reply	other threads:[~2006-08-19 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060819193113.GA7969@oleg \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox