public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:25:15 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060820152515.GA19948@openwall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060820082602.GB602@1wt.eu>

On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I'm just wondering why you return a SIGSEGV.

I've taken the SIGSEGV from binfmt_elf.c, where it is used on "Unable to
load interpreter", a condition that commonly occurs on OOM.

> When the kernel kills
> tasks on OOM conditions, it sends either SIGTERM or SIGKILL, as we
> can see here in mm/oom_kill.c:__oom_kill_task() :
> 
>         p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_MEMDIE;
>         /* This process has hardware access, be more careful. */
>         if (cap_t(p->cap_effective) & CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
>                 force_sig(SIGTERM, p);
>         } else {
>                 force_sig(SIGKILL, p);
>         }
> 
> Shouldn't we simply re-use the same code ?

I have no objections.

Thanks,

Alexander

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-20 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-20  0:38 [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits Solar Designer
2006-08-20  7:52 ` Kari Hurtta
2006-08-20 18:10   ` Alan Cox
2006-08-21  5:05     ` Kari Hurtta
2006-08-20  8:26 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 15:25   ` Solar Designer [this message]
2006-08-20 10:07 ` Alex Riesen
2006-08-20 15:30   ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 15:53     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-20 16:17       ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 16:28       ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-08-20 16:45         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-20 16:47         ` Michael Buesch
2006-08-20 16:48         ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 18:03     ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 18:10       ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 18:36         ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 18:21           ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 18:52             ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 19:01               ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 19:33                 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 19:17                   ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 16:04 ` Florian Weimer
2006-08-20 16:25   ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 18:14 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 22:12   ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 22:51     ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 22:58       ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 23:00       ` Alan Cox
2006-08-21  0:23       ` Peter Williams
2006-08-21  0:45         ` Solar Designer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060820152515.GA19948@openwall.com \
    --to=solar@openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox