From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
Alex Riesen <fork0@users.sourceforge.net>,
Willy Tarreau <wtarreau@hera.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:47:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608201847.05707.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44E88DC3.7000708@redhat.com>
On Sunday 20 August 2006 18:28, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > sounds like a good argument to get the setuid functions marked
> > __must_check in glibc...
>
> There are too many false positives. E.g., in a SUID binaries switching
> back from a non-root UID to root will not fail. Very common.
Well, I would say it clearly depends on the actual kernel
implementation if that can fail or not.
So userspace should really always check.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-20 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-20 0:38 [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits Solar Designer
2006-08-20 7:52 ` Kari Hurtta
2006-08-20 18:10 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-21 5:05 ` Kari Hurtta
2006-08-20 8:26 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 15:25 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 10:07 ` Alex Riesen
2006-08-20 15:30 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 15:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-20 16:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 16:28 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-08-20 16:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-20 16:47 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-08-20 16:48 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 18:03 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 18:10 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 18:36 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 18:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 18:52 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 19:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 19:33 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 19:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-20 16:04 ` Florian Weimer
2006-08-20 16:25 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 18:14 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 22:12 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 22:51 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 22:58 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-20 23:00 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-21 0:23 ` Peter Williams
2006-08-21 0:45 ` Solar Designer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608201847.05707.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=fork0@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=wtarreau@hera.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox