Re: [PATCH] getsockopt() early argument sanity checking

Eugene Teo
2006-08-21T12:10:37Z

Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:05:20AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>> On Sunday 20 August 2006 01:48, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:05:32AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
[snipped]
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index ac45b13..910ef88 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -1307,11 +1307,17 @@ asmlinkage long sys_setsockopt(int fd, i
> asmlinkage long sys_getsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, char *optval, int *optlen)
> {
> int err;
> + int len;
^^^^^^^^

> struct socket *sock;
>
> if ((sock = sockfd_lookup(fd, &err))!=NULL)
> {
> - if (level == SOL_SOCKET)
> + /* XXX: insufficient for SMP, but should be redundant anyway */
> + if (get_user(len, optlen))
> + err = -EFAULT;
> + else if (len < 0)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

s/else//

> + err = -EINVAL;
> + else if (level == SOL_SOCKET)

s/else//

> err=sock_getsockopt(sock,level,optname,optval,optlen);
> else
> err=sock->ops->getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen);

These checks are already in getsockopt(). Duplicated code?

Eugene
--
eteo redhat.com ph: +65 6490 4142 http://www.kernel.org/~eugeneteo
gpg fingerprint: 47B9 90F6 AE4A 9C51 37E0 D6E1 EA84 C6A2 58DF 8823