From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To: Robert Crocombe <rcrocomb@gmail.com>
Cc: Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@googlemail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:37:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060822013722.GA628@gnuppy.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6babb600608211721g739c5518sa14427d1e9f2334@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:21:35PM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
> On 8/18/06, hui Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> >Patch attached:
>
> The problem still appears to happen, but now I get no trace at all,
> just a single line reported to the machine's console (and not on the
> serial console):
>
> pdflush/314[CPU#2]: BUG in debug_rt_mutex_unlock at
> kernel/rt_mutex_debug.c:471
>
> i.e., a standard statement, except at pdflush instead of swapper this time.
Thanks for testing. I appreciate this and I'm more than just plain willing
to help out. Any thing goes to get this patch solid. :)
I'll come up with a patch tomorrow to try and get a clean stack trace. I've
made some change to the bug dump output to make it more preemption aware,
but, as you can, some tweeking is needed.
However, I don't think this is going to be a simple atomic violation problem
that I've seen numerous times before. That's what the previous patch tried to
address. It's seriously pointing to a problem with the rtmutex and/or how it's
used, maybe a corner case it's missing.
I'll start to look at it either tonight or tomorrow and see what's going on.
It's going to take me a bit so be patient. I'll definitely get back to you
on this. I've got a number of weeks to blow exclusively on -rt development,
so I'll be around for a little while longer, hopefully longer.
bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-22 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <e6babb600608012231r74470b77x6e7eaeab222ee160@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-02 5:37 ` Problems with 2.6.17-rt8 Robert Crocombe
2006-08-02 17:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 11:48 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 14:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:08 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:48 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 17:16 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 20:22 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-03 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 21:18 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 2:56 ` [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() " Bill Huey
2006-08-08 3:05 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 18:46 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 19:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 21:35 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 21:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 22:10 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 17:19 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 0:35 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 7:47 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 14:52 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 22:05 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-10 0:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-10 2:18 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 1:06 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 8:16 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-11 8:46 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 15:00 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-11 21:18 ` Bill Huey
[not found] ` <20060811221054.GA32459@gnuppy.monkey.org>
2006-08-14 17:56 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-14 23:44 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 10:43 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 17:53 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-18 11:59 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-22 0:21 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-22 1:37 ` Bill Huey [this message]
2006-08-22 23:20 ` rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...) Bill Huey
2006-08-22 23:21 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 17:14 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 17:24 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 20:20 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:05 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:08 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-24 1:22 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-24 1:46 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-25 7:19 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 1:24 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 1:28 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 2:37 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 10:28 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 10:49 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-28 18:33 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-28 20:28 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 4:05 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-29 17:11 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 17:19 ` Robert Crocombe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060822013722.GA628@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--to=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nielsen.esben@googlemail.com \
--cc=rcrocomb@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox