public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To: Robert Crocombe <rcrocomb@gmail.com>
Cc: Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@googlemail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:37:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060822013722.GA628@gnuppy.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6babb600608211721g739c5518sa14427d1e9f2334@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:21:35PM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
> On 8/18/06, hui Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> >Patch attached:
> 
> The problem still appears to happen, but now I get no trace at all,
> just a single line reported to the machine's console (and not on the
> serial console):
> 
> pdflush/314[CPU#2]: BUG in debug_rt_mutex_unlock at 
> kernel/rt_mutex_debug.c:471
> 
> i.e., a standard statement, except at pdflush instead of swapper this time.

Thanks for testing. I appreciate this and I'm more than just plain willing
to help out. Any thing goes to get this patch solid. :)

I'll come up with a patch tomorrow to try and get a clean stack trace. I've
made some change to the bug dump output to make it more preemption aware,
but, as you can, some tweeking is needed.

However, I don't think this is going to be a simple atomic violation problem
that I've seen numerous times before. That's what the previous patch tried to
address. It's seriously pointing to a problem with the rtmutex and/or how it's
used, maybe a corner case it's missing.

I'll start to look at it either tonight or tomorrow and see what's going on.
It's going to take me a bit so be patient. I'll definitely get back to you
on this. I've got a number of weeks to blow exclusively on -rt development,
so I'll be around for a little while longer, hopefully longer.

bill


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-22  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <e6babb600608012231r74470b77x6e7eaeab222ee160@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-02  5:37 ` Problems with 2.6.17-rt8 Robert Crocombe
2006-08-02 17:51   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 11:48     ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 14:27       ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:08         ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 15:27           ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:48             ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 16:04               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 17:16                 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 20:22         ` Bill Huey
2006-08-03 20:54           ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 21:18             ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08  2:56         ` [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() " Bill Huey
2006-08-08  3:05           ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 18:46             ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 19:06               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 21:35                 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 21:44                   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 22:10                     ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 17:19                   ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09  0:35               ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11  7:47               ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 14:52                 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 22:05             ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-10  0:00               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-10  2:18               ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11  1:06                 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11  8:16                   ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-11  8:46                     ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 15:00                   ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-11 21:18                     ` Bill Huey
     [not found]                       ` <20060811221054.GA32459@gnuppy.monkey.org>
2006-08-14 17:56                         ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-14 23:44                           ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 10:43                             ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 17:53                             ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-18 11:59                               ` Bill Huey
2006-08-22  0:21                                 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-22  1:37                                   ` Bill Huey [this message]
2006-08-22 23:20                                     ` rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...) Bill Huey
2006-08-22 23:21                                       ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 17:14                                       ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 17:24                                         ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 20:20                                         ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:05                                           ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:08                                             ` Bill Huey
2006-08-24  1:22                                               ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-24  1:46                                                 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-25  7:19                                                   ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26  1:24                                                     ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26  1:28                                                       ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26  2:37                                                         ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 10:28                                                       ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 10:49                                                       ` Bill Huey
2006-08-28 18:33                                                         ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-28 20:28                                                           ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29  4:05                                                             ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-29 17:11                                                               ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 17:19                                                                 ` Robert Crocombe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060822013722.GA628@gnuppy.monkey.org \
    --to=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nielsen.esben@googlemail.com \
    --cc=rcrocomb@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox