public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] sys_ioprio_set: don't disable irqs
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:59:49 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060826205949.GA1140@oleg> (raw)

It is not good to disable interrupts while traversing all tasks in the system.
As I see it, sys_ioprio_get() doesn't need to do it at all, sys_ioprio_set()
does it for cfq_ioc_set_ioprio(), the latter can disable irqs itself.

Also, add a comment to explain why do we need tasklist_lock.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- 2.6.18-rc4/block/cfq-iosched.c~5_setpr	2006-08-27 00:37:03.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.18-rc4/block/cfq-iosched.c	2006-08-27 00:38:57.000000000 +0400
@@ -1421,14 +1421,14 @@ static inline void changed_ioprio(struct
 }
 
 /*
- * callback from sys_ioprio_set, irqs are disabled
+ * callback from sys_ioprio_set.
  */
 static int cfq_ioc_set_ioprio(struct io_context *ioc, unsigned int ioprio)
 {
 	struct cfq_io_context *cic;
 	struct rb_node *n;
 
-	spin_lock(&cfq_exit_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&cfq_exit_lock);
 
 	n = rb_first(&ioc->cic_root);
 	while (n != NULL) {
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ static int cfq_ioc_set_ioprio(struct io_
 		n = rb_next(n);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock(&cfq_exit_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&cfq_exit_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
--- 2.6.18-rc4/fs/ioprio.c~5_setpr	2006-08-27 00:37:03.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.18-rc4/fs/ioprio.c	2006-08-27 00:54:17.000000000 +0400
@@ -81,7 +81,12 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioprio_set(int which
 	}
 
 	ret = -ESRCH;
-	read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	/*
+	 * We want IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP/IOPRIO_WHO_USER to be "atomic",
+	 * so we can't use rcu_read_lock(). See re-copy of ->ioprio
+	 * in copy_process().
+	 */
+	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	switch (which) {
 		case IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS:
 			if (!who)
@@ -124,7 +129,7 @@ free_uid:
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -170,7 +175,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioprio_get(int which
 	int ret = -ESRCH;
 	int tmpio;
 
-	read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	switch (which) {
 		case IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS:
 			if (!who)
@@ -221,7 +226,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioprio_get(int which
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 


             reply	other threads:[~2006-08-26 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-26 20:59 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2006-08-29  7:16 ` [PATCH RESEND] sys_ioprio_set: don't disable irqs Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060826205949.GA1140@oleg \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox