public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:01:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608271801.44774.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060827084417.918992193@goop.org>


Very cool.

> - Make it work.  It works UP on a test QEMU machine, but it doesn't
>   yet work on real hardware, or SMP (though not working SMP on QEMU is
>   more likely to be a QEMU problem).  Not sure what the problem is yet;
>   I'm hoping review will reveal something.

I bet qemu doesn't have a real descriptor cache unlike real CPUs.
So likely it is some disconnect between changing the backing GDT
and referencing the register. Reload %gs more aggressively?

Comparing with SimNow! (which should behave more like a real CPU)
might be also interesting.

> - Measure performance impact.  The patch adds a segment register
>   save/restore on entry/exit to the kernel.  This expense should be
>   offset by savings in using the PDA while in the kernel, but I haven't
>   measured this yet.  Space savings are already appealing though.
> - Modify more things to use the PDA.  The more that uses it, the more
>   the cost of the %gs save/restore is amortized.  smp_processor_id and
>   current are the obvious first choices, which are implemented in this
>   series.

per cpu data would be the prime candidate. It is pretty simple.

> - Make it a config option?  UP systems don't need to do any of this,
>   other than having a single pre-allocated PDA.  Unfortunately, it gets
>   a bit messy to do this given the changes needed in handling %gs.

Please don't.

(weak point:)

- The stack protector code might work one day on i386 too.

-Andi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-27 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-27  8:44 [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] Basic definitions for i386-pda Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] Initialize the per-CPU data area Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] Use %gs as the PDA base-segment in the kernel Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  9:49   ` Keith Owens
2006-08-27 10:01     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 15:57   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 16:36     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 17:20     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 18:19       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 20:03         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-27 23:38         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-28  9:51         ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-28 14:54           ` H. J. Lu
2006-08-28 17:24         ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] Fix places where using %gs changes the usermode ABI Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 15:59   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 16:37     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] Implement smp_processor_id() with the PDA Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] Implement "current" " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 16:01   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 16:38     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  9:47 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386 Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-27 16:46   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 17:44     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-27 18:07       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 18:27         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 16:01 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-08-27 16:41   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 17:21 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-08-27 17:34   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 18:23     ` Andreas Mohr
2006-08-27 18:04   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 18:27     ` Andreas Mohr
2006-08-27 18:35       ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-28  9:06 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-30  9:00 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-30  9:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-30 12:33 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-30 12:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 16:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-30 16:48   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:13     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-30 17:32       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200608271801.44774.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox