public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Paul E McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] RCU: use a separate softirq
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:41:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060828161112.GD3325@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060828160845.GB3325@in.ibm.com>


Finally, RCU gets its own softirq. With it being used extensively,
the per-cpu tasklet used earlier was just a softirq with overheads.
This makes things more efficient.

Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
---


 include/linux/interrupt.h |    3 ++-
 kernel/rcuclassic.c       |   12 +++++-------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-softirq kernel/rcuclassic.c
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu/kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-softirq	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcuclassic.c	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_data) = { 0L };
 
 /* Fake initialization required by compiler */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, rcu_tasklet) = {NULL};
 static int blimit = 10;
 static int qhimark = 10000;
 static int qlowmark = 100;
@@ -212,7 +211,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data
 	if (!rdp->donelist)
 		rdp->donetail = &rdp->donelist;
 	else
-		tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, rdp->cpu));
+		raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -363,7 +362,6 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
 					&per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
 	put_cpu_var(rcu_data);
 	put_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data);
-	tasklet_kill_immediate(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu), cpu);
 }
 
 #else
@@ -375,7 +373,7 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
 #endif
 
 /*
- * This does the RCU processing work from tasklet context. 
+ * This does the RCU processing work from softirq context. 
  */
 static void __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
 					struct rcu_data *rdp)
@@ -420,7 +418,7 @@ static void __rcu_process_callbacks(stru
 		rcu_do_batch(rdp);
 }
 
-static void rcu_process_callbacks(unsigned long unused)
+static void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused)
 {
 	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_ctrlblk, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_data));
 	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data));
@@ -484,7 +482,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int us
 		rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
 	} else if (!in_softirq())
 		rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
-	tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu));
+	raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
 }
 
 static void rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
@@ -507,7 +505,7 @@ static void __devinit rcu_online_cpu(int
 
 	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_ctrlblk, rdp);
 	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_bh_ctrlblk, bh_rdp);
-	tasklet_init(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu), rcu_process_callbacks, 0UL);
+	open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks, NULL);
 }
 
 static int __devinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
diff -puN include/linux/interrupt.h~rcu-softirq include/linux/interrupt.h
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu/include/linux/interrupt.h~rcu-softirq	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu-dipankar/include/linux/interrupt.h	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
@@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ enum
 	NET_TX_SOFTIRQ,
 	NET_RX_SOFTIRQ,
 	BLOCK_SOFTIRQ,
-	TASKLET_SOFTIRQ
+	TASKLET_SOFTIRQ,
+	RCU_SOFTIRQ	/* Preferable RCU should always be the last softirq */
 };
 
 /* softirq mask and active fields moved to irq_cpustat_t in

_

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-28 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-28 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] RCU: split classic rcu Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-31  1:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-08-28 16:11 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2006-08-31  1:13   ` [PATCH 2/4] RCU: use a separate softirq Paul E. McKenney
2006-08-28 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] RCU: preemptible RCU implementation Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 20:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-29  1:33     ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] RCU: clean up RCU trace Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:15 ` [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-28 16:29   ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:33     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-28 16:43       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-28 19:16   ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 19:40     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-29  0:23       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-29  0:28         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-30  0:40       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060828161112.GD3325@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox