From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Riley@williams.name, davej@redhat.com, pageexec@freemail.hu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:59:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608301459.15008.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060830121845.GA351@1wt.eu>
> Unfortunately, this situation is even more difficult for me, because it's
> getting very hard to track patches that get applied, rejected, modified or
> obsoleted, which is even more true when people don't always think about
> sending an ACK after the patch finally gets in. I already have a few pending
> patches in my queue waiting for an ACK that will have to be tracked if the
> persons do not respond, say, within one week. Otherwise I might simply lose
> them.
It shouldn't be that hard to check gitweb or git output occasionally
for the patches. You can probably even automate that.
> I think that the good method would be to :
> - announce the patch
> - find a volunteer to port it
> - apply it once the volunteer agrees to handle it
> This way, no code gets lost because there's always someone to track it.
I can put that one into my tree for .19
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-30 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-30 6:39 [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 9:51 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 12:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 12:59 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-08-30 13:16 ` Willy Tarreau
[not found] ` <20060830100015.6b967c32.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-08-30 13:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 14:00 ` Sean
[not found] ` <44F5D81A.9650.5BE48F99@pageexec.freemail.hu>
2006-08-30 16:30 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 16:59 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-08-30 17:02 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:15 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
[not found] ` <44F5E818.20898.5C230A79@pageexec.freemail.hu>
2006-08-30 17:52 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <44F5F348.1251.5C4EBCCB@pageexec.freemail.hu>
2006-08-30 18:26 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 19:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 19:36 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 20:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 20:06 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 20:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 21:31 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-31 2:05 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608301459.15008.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=Riley@williams.name \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox