public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Riley@williams.name, davej@redhat.com, pageexec@freemail.hu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:59:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608301459.15008.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060830121845.GA351@1wt.eu>


> Unfortunately, this situation is even more difficult for me, because it's
> getting very hard to track patches that get applied, rejected, modified or
> obsoleted, which is even more true when people don't always think about
> sending an ACK after the patch finally gets in. I already have a few pending
> patches in my queue waiting for an ACK that will have to be tracked if the
> persons do not respond, say, within one week. Otherwise I might simply lose
> them.

It shouldn't be that hard to check gitweb or git output occasionally
for the patches. You can probably even automate that.
 
> I think that the good method would be to :
>   - announce the patch
>   - find a volunteer to port it
>   - apply it once the volunteer agrees to handle it
> This way, no code gets lost because there's always someone to track it.

I can put that one into my tree for .19

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-30 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-30  6:39 [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30  9:51 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 12:18   ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 12:59     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-08-30 13:16       ` Willy Tarreau
     [not found]         ` <20060830100015.6b967c32.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-08-30 13:46           ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 14:00           ` Sean
     [not found]       ` <44F5D81A.9650.5BE48F99@pageexec.freemail.hu>
2006-08-30 16:30         ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 16:59           ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-08-30 17:02             ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:15               ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
     [not found]           ` <44F5E818.20898.5C230A79@pageexec.freemail.hu>
2006-08-30 17:52             ` Andi Kleen
     [not found]               ` <44F5F348.1251.5C4EBCCB@pageexec.freemail.hu>
2006-08-30 18:26                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 19:01                   ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 19:36                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 20:03                       ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 20:06                         ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 20:40                           ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-30 21:31                         ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-31  2:05 Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200608301459.15008.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=Riley@williams.name \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox