From: Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@gmail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johninsd@san.rr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:23:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060830222303.11b35276@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44F5E01C.3010807@zytor.com>
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:59:40 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > This is not entirely true...
> > All architectures sets saved_command_line variable...
> > So I can add __init to the saved_command_line and
> > copy its contents into kmalloced persistence_command_line at
> > main.c.
> >
>
> My opinion is that you should change saved_command_line (which
> already implies a copy) to be the kmalloc'd version and call the
> fixed-sized buffer something else.
>
> -hpa
Changing saved_command_line is a modification to all
architectures... They all modify this variable...
So, should I submit a patch to all architectures? How can I test this?
Also for i386 the code is assembly... So I can modify the code to write
into a __init buffer and then kmalloc in setup.c.
Please instruct me how to proceed...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-30 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-05 13:37 [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit Alon Bar-Lev
2006-05-05 14:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-05 14:28 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-05-05 14:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-05 18:10 ` John Coffman
2006-05-05 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-05 21:48 ` John Coffman
2006-05-05 21:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-06 3:57 ` John Coffman
2006-05-06 5:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-06 10:31 ` Alon Bar-Lev
[not found] ` <44AD583B.5040007@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <44AD5BB4.9090005@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <44AD5D47.8010307@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <44AD5FD8.6010307@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <9e0cf0bf0608031436x19262ab0rb2271b52ce75639d@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <44D278D6.2070106@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <9e0cf0bf0608031542q2da20037h828f4b8f0d01c4d5@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <44D27F22.4080205@zytor.com>
2006-08-25 23:57 ` [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping) Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-27 18:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 18:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-27 19:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 19:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-27 20:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 3:28 ` John Coffman
2006-08-28 6:02 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 6:41 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 7:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 12:19 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 18:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 18:46 ` Matt Domsch
2006-08-28 19:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 20:12 ` Matt Domsch
2006-08-28 20:29 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 20:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 20:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 16:49 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-30 16:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:06 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-30 17:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:51 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-30 18:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 19:06 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 19:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 19:23 ` Alon Bar-Lev [this message]
2006-08-30 19:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 18:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 19:24 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 20:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-29 0:13 ` [PATCH] Fix the EDD code misparsing the command line H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-29 1:24 ` Petr Vandrovec
2006-08-29 1:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-29 1:51 ` [PATCH] Fix the EDD code misparsing the command line (rev 2) H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-27 19:59 ` [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping) Alon Bar-Lev
2006-05-05 22:02 ` [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit Alon Bar-Lev
[not found] <6OyEf-3Zm-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6PCwg-3mz-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6PDBU-5Qb-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6PDBU-5Qb-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-08-31 17:32 ` [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping) Bodo Eggert
2006-08-31 17:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060830222303.11b35276@localhost \
--to=alon.barlev@gmail.com \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=johninsd@san.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox