public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, okuji@enbug.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/6] fault-injection capability for alloc_pages()
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:25:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608311225.02101.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060831100820.697247381@localhost.localdomain>

On Thursday 31 August 2006 12:07, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> This patch provides fault-injection capability for alloc_pages()
> 
> boot option:
> 
> 	fail_page_alloc=<probability>,<interval>,<times>,<space>
> 
> 	<probability>
> 
> 		specifies how often it should fail in percent.
> 
> 	<interval>
> 
> 		specifies the interval of failures.
> 
> 	<times>
> 
> 		specifies how many times failures may happen at most.
> 
> 	<space>
> 
> 		specifies the size of free space where memory can be allocated
> 		safely in pages.
> 
> Example:
> 
> 	fail_page_alloc=100,10,-1,0
> 
> page allocation fails once per 10 times.

I still think this will need some better filters to be useful. At least
a optional uid filter perhaps (make sure to handle the interrupt case
correctly, interrupts don't belong to the uid) , and perhaps an option to only 
fail GFP_ATOMIC.

With arbitary failing the system will just be unusable, right? Or would
you run some system you use this way? @)

Another possibility would be to look up __builtin_return_address(0) in 
the module table and allow failing only for a specific module.


-andi

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-31 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-31 10:07 [patch 0/6] RFC: fault-injection capabilities (v2) Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:07 ` [patch 1/6] fault-injection capabilities infrastructure Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:22   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-31 10:07 ` [patch 2/6] fault-injection capability for kmalloc Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:07 ` [patch 3/6] fault-injection capability for alloc_pages() Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:25   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-08-31 10:35     ` Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:45       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-31 10:08 ` [patch 4/6] fault-injection capability for disk IO Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:08 ` [patch 5/6] debugfs entries for configuration Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:08 ` [patch 6/6] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 17:29 ` [patch 0/6] RFC: fault-injection capabilities (v2) Josh Triplett
2006-08-31 18:31   ` Kyle Moffett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200608311225.02101.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mita@miraclelinux.com \
    --cc=okuji@enbug.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox