From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751259AbWIAGvO (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 02:51:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751252AbWIAGuu (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 02:50:50 -0400 Received: from mx2.go2.pl ([193.17.41.42]:27064 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964871AbWIAGtS (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 02:49:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:52:39 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] in 2.6.18-rc5 Message-ID: <20060901065239.GB2065@ff.dom.local> References: <20060901064319.GA2065@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060901064319.GA2065@ff.dom.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:43:19AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > spin_unlock_irqrestore() goes through lockdep > but spin_lock_irqrestore() doesn't. but spin_lock_irqsave() doesn't! Jarek P.