From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964897AbWIAIaU (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 04:30:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964898AbWIAIaU (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 04:30:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33729 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964897AbWIAIaU (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 04:30:20 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386. Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:30:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>, Zachary Amsden , Jan Beulich , Andrew Morton References: <20060901064718.918494029@goop.org> <200609011016.45600.ak@suse.de> <44F7EEA2.3090600@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <44F7EEA2.3090600@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609011030.06859.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 01 September 2006 10:26, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > I applied it now, with one change. I replaced the %Ps with %cs because > > that is apparently the more official way to do that in gcc. Please > > change that in your copy too. > > > > Do you mean the %P0, etc in the asms? Yes. > > There unfortunately were still quite a lot of rejects because -mm* > > is too different from mainline, but I fixed them all. > > > Thanks. Were there more conflicts than entry.S? Yes ptrace-abi.h doesn't exist and the ""s in the Subject of your last patch caused quilt to freak out. I think there was one other too. I hope everything still works. At least one of my test machines is currently completely unhappy on i386 with random hangs (even before your patches), still bisecting it. -Andi