public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Damon LaCrosse <arid@inbox.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.17 odd hd slow down
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:57:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060906105755.GZ14565@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r6ypuy3v.fsf@inbox.ru>

On Wed, Sep 06 2006, Damon LaCrosse wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> experimenting a little the 2.6 block device layer I detected under
> some circumstances a net slowness in the disk throughput. Strangely
> enough, in fact, my IDE disk reported a significant performance drop
> off in correspondence of certain access patterns.
> 
> Following further investigations I was able to simulate this ill
> behavior in the following piece of code, clearly showing a non
> negligible hard-disk slow down when the step value is set greater than
> 8. These result in fact far below the hard-disk real speed
> (30~70MB/sec), as correctly measured instead in correspondence of low
> STEP values (<8). In particular, with step of 512 or above, the
> overall performance scored by the disk results below 2MB/sec.

You are effectively approaching seeky writes, I bet it's just the drive
firmware biting you. Repeat the test on a different drive, and see if
you see an identical pattern.

> At first I thought to a side-effect of the queue plug/unplug
> mechanism: the scattered accesses involve the unplug timeout to each
> bio. So, I added the BIO_RW_SYNC flag that - AFAIK - should force the
> queue unplugging. Unfortunately nothing changes.
> 
> Now, as it is quite possible that I'm missing something, the question
> is: is there an effective way of doing scattered disk accesses using
> bios? In other words, how can I fix the following program in order to
> get disk full speed for steps > 8?

I don't think the io path has anything to do with this. Why are you
expecting non-sequential writes to continue to be fast? They wont be.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-06 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-06  9:45 2.6.17 odd hd slow down Damon LaCrosse
2006-09-06 10:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-09-06 12:06   ` Damon LaCrosse
2006-09-06 12:06   ` Damon LaCrosse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060906105755.GZ14565@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=arid@inbox.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox